<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">INK</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Inkanyiso</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">2077-2815</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2077-8317</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>AOSIS</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">INK-18-341</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/ink.v18i1.341</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>A theological reflection on garden weddings: Interrogating the Reformed liturgy within the African context</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1398-1373</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Mudau</surname>
<given-names>Ndidzulafhi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="AF0001"><label>1</label>Department of Human Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><bold>Corresponding author:</bold> Ndidzulafhi Mudau, <email xlink:href="ndidzulafhi.mudau@univen.ac.za">ndidzulafhi.mudau@univen.ac.za</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>07</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<volume>18</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<elocation-id>341</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>02</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>08</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2026. The Author</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study analyses the tension between the Reformed churches&#x2019; traditional emphasis on formal liturgical worship in church buildings and the increasing inclination towards outdoor or garden weddings in African Reformed contexts. The central question is whether outdoor settings may uphold Reformed theological tenets while authentically incorporating African cultural expressions. A contextual theological framework was developed to evaluate garden marriages in Reformed churches, analyse the suitability of outdoor environments with Reformed liturgical norms and provide guidelines that honour both traditions. The employed methodology, hermeneutical analysis, integrates Reformed interpretative traditions with African perspectives. Research was conducted using resources such as Journal Storage (JSTOR), EBSCOhost, Google Scholar and American Theological Library Association Serials (ATLAS), incorporating search terms relevant to Reformed liturgy, African worship, garden weddings, contextual theology and related subjects. Of the 47 identified sources, 38 met the inclusion criteria, prioritising peer-reviewed articles and academic monographs published between 2010 and 2025, with pre-2010 sources included only when foundational. The findings indicate that outdoor settings are not inherently theologically problematic when appropriate procedures enable genuine worship expression. Garden environments can elevate traditional African communal celebrations while preserving essential elements of Reformed covenant theology.</p>
<sec id="st1">
<title>Contribution</title>
<p>The study recommends that African Reformed churches establish denominational standards for evaluating garden wedding venues, develop minimum liturgical prerequisites for outdoor ceremonies and engage in ongoing contextual theological exploration. This ensures that venue choices honour both Reformed confessional principles and authentic African cultural expressions, thereby enriching discussions on liturgical inculturation and postcolonial African Christianity.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Reformed liturgy</kwd>
<kwd>garden weddings</kwd>
<kwd>African context</kwd>
<kwd>liturgical integrity</kwd>
<kwd>contextual theology</kwd>
<kwd>cultural adaptation</kwd>
<kwd>post-colonial theology</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement><bold>Funding information</bold> This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s0001">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The rising prevalence of garden marriages in African black Reformed churches has engendered a substantial theological and pastoral quandary that necessitates immediate scholarly investigation. This friction operates at multiple interrelated levels, posing significant challenges for church leadership, congregational identity and doctrinal integrity. The primary problem arises from a direct clash between established Reformed liturgical traditions and modern African cultural expressions (Galbreath <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2019</xref>; Toliver <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0043">2020</xref>:iv). Smit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0041">2017</xref>:34) underscores that the Reformed tradition has traditionally emphasised structured liturgical activities, which maintain the solemnity and social affirmation essential for marriage as a holy covenant before God. The increasing popularity of outdoor weddings disrupts the customary framework, raising theological identity issues for African Reformed congregations. Farmer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0014">2025</xref>:147) contends that Calvin&#x2019;s theological framework, which explicitly rejects medieval concepts of consecrated spaces, paradoxically supports outdoor worship, while Reformed liturgical practice has established specific criteria for worship environments that promote reverence, order and congregational participation. This apparent discord presents difficulties for the ecclesiastical authority tasked with reconciling Calvin&#x2019;s theological tenets with contemporary liturgical practices. The lack of denominational direction has resulted in pastoral confusion and theological uncertainty. Church leaders are compelled to make impromptu choices regarding venue permissions without clear criteria to assess whether outdoor locations adhere to the liturgical standards mandated by Reformed covenant theology (Dowson <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0013">2021</xref>:49). The absence of theological reflection endangers either rigid conformity to traditional European frameworks, perhaps suppressing authentic African cultural expression, or uncritical acceptance of local practices, which may undermine essential Reformed liturgical principles. The friction is particularly pronounced as pastors and church councils face critical decisions about aligning outdoor weddings with the fundamental tenets of Reformed covenant theology and the authentic representation of African Christian identity, in the absence of explicit directives from their denominations (Packiam <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0036">2022</xref>). This imposes an inequitable load on local church leadership and engenders inequities among congregations. A notable tension arises from the conflict between cultural authenticity and confessional integrity (Warfield <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0047">2020</xref>). Yirenkyi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0051">2019</xref>:29) states that traditional African marriage ceremonies typically occurred in communal outdoor settings, such as beneath ancestral trees, within family compounds, or at village meeting places, emphasising the social celebration of covenant bonds and community involvement. The growing prevalence of garden weddings among African Reformed Christians may signify both adherence to contemporary trends and a revival of old cultural practices that embody Christian values. This cultural resurgence conflicts with colonial religious organisations that, as Harries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2018</xref>) observes, either disregarded or repressed traditional African marital customs. Colonial missionary endeavours sometimes perceived traditional African marital practices as &#x2018;pagan&#x2019; or &#x2018;uncivilised&#x2019;, compelling converts to renounce cultural behaviours that might have been theologically congruent with Reformed principles. Modern African Reformed churches are striving to contest conventional colonial ecclesiastical practices while pursuing authentic manifestations of Christian faith that respect both Reformed theological principles and legitimate African cultural representations (Bainbridge <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0005">2015</xref>:23). The discord escalates while addressing practical liturgical issues. Peil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0037">2024</xref>:9) demonstrates that Reformed liturgical practice has established certain standards for worship settings that promote reverence, order and congregational participation. Garden weddings pose numerous practical challenges with theological ramifications: (1) weather variability can interrupt liturgical events, threatening the solemnity and continuity essential for successful covenant-making ceremonies; (2) insufficient acoustic conditions may impede congregational engagement, undermining the communal testimony integral to Reformed marriage theology; and (3) commercial pressures on garden venues may prioritise aesthetic factors over spiritual significance (De Lacy &#x0026; Shackleton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">2017</xref>). These pragmatic impediments transform into theological concerns when they threaten fundamental elements of the marriage rite, as Reformed theology underscores that marriage is a covenant established before God and acknowledged by the religious community. The conflict is exacerbated by substantial postcolonial theological issues. Iheanacho (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0021">2021</xref>:7) asserts that authentic African Christianity requires a deliberate amalgamation of indigenous cultural traditions with Christian beliefs, rather than mere imitation of Western ecclesiastical frameworks. This integration process generates conflict between advocates of classic European Reformed traditions and supporters of genuine African Christian manifestations. The difficulty lies in distinguishing between essential Christian theological principles and cultural manifestations that may vary across contexts, as observed by Sarkodie (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0039">2023</xref>). This paradigm necessitates evaluating traditional African marriage ceremonies according to their capacity to uphold, rather than contradict, Christian theological principles of covenant relationships. The various layers of friction highlight the pressing necessity for a cohesive theological framework capable of properly addressing these discrepancies. Mbiti&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0028">2015</xref>:20) notion of &#x2018;true African Christianity&#x2019; advocates for manifestations of the Christian faith that are distinctly African and authentically Christian, offering possible criteria for assessing garden weddings. The lack of a framework in denominational guidance engenders persistent tension and ambiguity. The research is crucial for delineating explicit theological boundaries that help African Reformed churches address these intricate issues while preserving theological integrity and cultural authenticity. In the absence of such instruction, friction will persist, resulting in discord, inconsistency and doctrinal ambiguity within African Reformed communities. This notable tension in theological, pastoral, cultural, liturgical and postcolonial dimensions necessitate urgent systematic research that can offer practical advice while honouring both Reformed confessional beliefs and authentic African cultural expressions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0002">
<title>Literature review</title>
<p>This section analyses the existing scholarly literature on the theological and liturgical issues surrounding garden weddings in Reformed churches, with particular emphasis on the African context. The review is methodically organised by theme and employs Reformed liturgical theology, biblical studies, African theology and architectural theology to establish the theoretical framework for this study. The examined literature includes peer-reviewed journal articles, academic monographs and confessional texts, emphasising sources published from 2015 forward, while integrating essential previous works where necessary. The analysis reveals that, despite growing scholarly interest in the convergence of Reformed liturgy with African cultural practices, a systematic theological framework for evaluating outdoor wedding settings within this tradition remains underdeveloped in the existing literature.</p>
<sec id="s20003">
<title>The dynamic nature of Reformed liturgical tradition</title>
<p>The Reformed liturgical tradition signifies the worship patterns, beliefs and practices that emerged from the 16th century Protestant Reformation, particularly shaped by the theological perspectives of John Calvin, Heinrich Bullinger and their successors. Reformed liturgy essentially follows the regulative principle of worship, positing that communal worship should be predominantly guided by Scripture rather than by human innovation or ecclesiastical tradition (Weaver &#x0026; Witvliet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0048">2023</xref>:3). However, viewing Reformed liturgy solely through this doctrinal lens may reduce it to a rigid set of prescriptions. Reformed liturgical practice has never been uniform or unchanging.</p>
<p>Contrary to prevalent notions about the constancy of ecclesiastical custom, the Reformed tradition has consistently demonstrated considerable diversity in its liturgical expression across many historical epochs, geographical locales and cultural settings. German, Barton and Macinnes (eds. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">2021</xref>) demonstrate that significant variations existed within 16th-century Reformed groups, specifically between Genevan, Zwinglian and Scottish worship practices, each shaped by distinct political, cultural and theological influences. These initial divergences established a benchmark for contextual flexibility that has endured within the tradition over the centuries.</p>
<p>Gibson and Earngey (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">2018</xref>) assert that Reformed worship has continually evolved in response to its cultural context, functioning not as a fixed liturgical framework but as a theologically guided, culturally shaped interaction with the living God. This understanding challenges the idea that Reformed liturgy is a consistent, unchanging framework. It represents a tradition dedicated to continuous theological contemplation concerning the essence of authentic worship in certain locations and periods. Kaemingk and Willson (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0024">2020</xref>:4) contend that Reformed communities globally have consistently reinterpreted essential liturgical elements, including the gathering, the Word, the Table and the sending, via culturally appropriate lenses while preserving their theological purity.</p>
<p>The geographical expansion of Reformed Christianity throughout Africa, Asia and Latin America through missionary efforts further influenced the tradition&#x2019;s liturgical identity. Burnett-Cole (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0010">2023</xref>:176) observes that the exportation of European Reformed worship practices to the Global South was rarely a neutral theological initiative; it was deeply interwoven with colonial power dynamics that prioritised Western liturgical aesthetics over indigenous traditions. The imposition of European ecclesiastical building, formal liturgical language and structured ceremonies significantly suppressed indigenous cultural expressions, presenting a culturally unique way of worship as the norm. This colonial dynamic has led several postcolonial liturgical historians to challenge the concept of Reformed liturgy as a static construct, arguing that its apparent uniformity was an ideological imposition rather than a theological necessity (Maluleke <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0026">2020</xref>:7).</p>
<p>Breytenbach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0009">2025</xref>:40) supports this perspective from a South African viewpoint, noting that the Dutch Reformed Church&#x2019;s liturgical uniformity during apartheid was upheld not only by theological convictions, but also by political and racial ideologies that utilised liturgical conformity as a means of social control. The dismantling of apartheid necessitated both political transformation and liturgical decolonisation, aiming for a reimagined Reformed worship liberated from colonial constraints. This has generated significant potential for contextual liturgical innovation within African Reformed congregations, including the growing use of activities such as outdoor worship, communal celebration and the integration of African musical and ceremonial traditions.</p>
<p>Moll (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0029">2025</xref>:80) similarly underscores that post-apartheid South African liturgical scholarship has increasingly embraced the concept of liturgical inculturation, the process through which the gospel and its worship forms are authentically expressed within a particular cultural context, regarded as both theologically sound and pastorally vital. This concept, derived from Catholic missiology and gradually adopted by Protestant groups, posits that no single cultural expression of worship possesses ultimate theological superiority. Authentic Reformed worship, from this perspective, is defined not by adherence to European liturgical customs but by fidelity to essential theological ideas expressed in contextually appropriate ways.</p>
<p>Iheanacho (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0021">2021</xref>) elaborates on this argument concerning the African diaspora, demonstrating that Reformed communities in sub-Saharan Africa are creatively redefining liturgical acceptability by integrating African communal values, oral traditions and celebratory practices into Reformed worship, all while upholding their confessional commitments. This revision reflects the tradition&#x2019;s essential dedication to contextual authenticity over rigid adherence, a concept arguably more congruent with the Reformation&#x2019;s hermeneutical perspective than the liturgical conservatism that has often dominated Reformed church culture.</p>
<p>Therefore, the notion of &#x2018;Reformed liturgy&#x2019; as a static, immutable construct must be recognised as historically inaccurate and theologically untenable. The history of the tradition illustrates a dynamic, adaptive liturgical identity that has continually engaged with its cultural and religious contexts. Nyawuza (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0032">2019</xref>) asserts that the challenge for contemporary African Reformed churches is not the choice to engage in contextual liturgical adaptation, but rather in identifying approaches that maintain theological accountability to Reformed confessional principles while genuinely honouring the cultural heritage and communal identity of African worshippers. The tension between theological integrity and cultural authenticity is the core issue to be examined in the study of garden marriages within African Reformed contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20004">
<title>Historical development of Reformed wedding practices</title>
<p>Calvin&#x2019;s philosophical framework significantly contested medieval Catholic notions of hallowed space and clerical authority (Holder <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0020">2022</xref>). His reforms were theological and pragmatic, designed to eradicate superstitious connections with sacred edifices while underscoring devotion &#x2018;in spirit and truth&#x2019; (Jn 4:23&#x2013;24). Crawford (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2021</xref>:55) asserted that God&#x2019;s presence transcends spatial constraints, manifesting among assembled believers rather than being confined to specific edifices.</p>
<p>The incremental standardisation of church edifices for Reformed nuptials emerged from historical influences, including governmental legitimacy, liturgical evolution and societal acceptance, rather than doctrinal stipulations (Gibson &#x0026; Earngey <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">2018</xref>). As Reformed churches acquired social legitimacy, formal church edifices emerged as emblems of respectability and legal authority. This development signifies cultural progress rather than a prescriptive philosophy.</p>
<p>Historical precedents for outdoor Reformed worship are apparent in several areas. In the 17th century, despite the Scottish persecution, Reformed churches conducted full worship services, including marriages, in secluded areas while preserving liturgical integrity (Old <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0035">2023</xref>:88). Early Reformed settlers in North America often performed wedding ceremonies outside for practical reasons, so establishing precedents for outdoor Reformed worship while maintaining theological integrity (Mayhew-Smith <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0027">2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0005">
<title>Research methods and design</title>
<sec id="s20006">
<title>Theological foundations of sacred space in Reformed thought</title>
<p>Modern Reformed theologians have elaborated on Calvin&#x2019;s perspectives on worship settings, offering theological underpinnings for examining current liturgical practices. Tsatalbasidis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0044">2019</xref>:23) contends that although certain locations lack intrinsic sanctity, physical settings substantially influence the quality and integrity of liturgy. Venue selection should prioritise actual capability to facilitate genuine worship rather than superficial spatial sanctity.</p>
<p>Jones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0023">2025</xref>:183) contends that a suitable liturgical environment facilitates true worship rather than generates it. Churches facilitate worship through practical design features, such as acoustic properties, seating configurations and visual focal points, rather than through intrinsic purity. This insight suggests that garden spaces may enhance Reformed worship by providing suitable practical conditions for liturgical expression.</p>
<p>Von Allmen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0046">2023</xref>) asserts that liturgical alterations are theologically valid when they augment rather than diminish fundamental elements of worship. This principle asserts that garden marriages are permissible for outdoor ceremonies if they foster genuine Reformed liturgical expression while fulfilling practical needs for community involvement and respectful worship.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20007">
<title>Liturgical centres and spatial theology in Reformed worship</title>
<p>Protestant worship and church architecture offer essential insights that substantially reinforce the theological framework for evaluating garden weddings in Reformed traditions (Bains <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">2022</xref>:448). The notion of liturgical centres provides a refined theological framework for assessing worship places according to their ability to facilitate fundamental liturgical actions, rather than their aesthetic or conventional designs (Baldovin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2025</xref>). This method is especially pertinent for assessing outdoor wedding settings in the context of Reformed ecclesiology.</p>
<p>Three essential liturgical focal points in the Reformed tradition must be preserved in any worship setting: (1) the altar-table (symbolising the community&#x2019;s sacramental life), (2) the pulpit or ambo (signifying the supremacy of God&#x2019;s Word) and (3) the font (representing initiation into the covenant community) (Nguyen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0030">2020</xref>). His focus on the font, altar and pulpit in diverse interpretations of worship space illustrates that theological integrity relies not on physical architecture but on the functional configuration and symbolic significance of these liturgical focal points (Nguyen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0030">2020</xref>). This framework outlines specific criteria for evaluating garden wedding venues&#x2019; capacity to uphold Reformed liturgical purity.</p>
<p>The liturgical centre technique employed in African Reformed church weddings posits that outdoor locations are theologically suitable if they facilitate the clear delineation and proper execution of fundamental worship elements (Van Eeden <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0045">2018</xref>:57). Essential matters regarding the nature and function of the Church in worship must be addressed prior to any congregation&#x2019;s preparation to construct or arrange worship facilities, which is directly relevant to the choice of locations for wedding ceremonies. The theological inquiry emphasises not the venue&#x2019;s location, whether indoors or outdoors, but rather the site&#x2019;s capacity to facilitate the genuine proclamation of God&#x2019;s Word, a suitable sacramental celebration and significant community involvement (Rempel <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0038">2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20008">
<title>Architectural theology and cultural context</title>
<p>The theological framework acknowledges the interconnectedness of architecture, art and theology, with each component shaping and influencing the others (Adashinskaya <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0001">2022</xref>:31). This understanding affirms the apprehensions expressed by African Reformed churches in their pursuit of spaces that respect both Reformed theological tenets and genuine cultural manifestations. This study indicates that liturgical validity arises from theological intent rather than compliance with specific architectural traditions rooted in European contexts (Hackett <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">2025</xref>:169).</p>
<p>The amalgamation of White&#x2019;s architectural theology with the South African Reformed setting demonstrates how garden weddings might exemplify what scholars in the South African Reformed tradition may refer to as &#x2018;liturgical contextualisation&#x2019; (Baron &#x0026; Let&#x0161;osa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2021</xref>). The revised study underscores that &#x2018;liturgy within the church service context, particularly regarding external life, is crucial&#x2019; for genuine Christian expression (Baron &#x0026; Let&#x0161;osa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20009">
<title>Integration with African Reformed liturgical development</title>
<p>The use of the liturgical centre technique in the African Reformed context necessitates a thorough examination of how indigenous cultural features might augment rather than undermine fundamental liturgical functions (Sikorska <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0040">2021</xref>). Current South African Reformed liturgical studies increasingly acknowledge that &#x2018;liturgical inculturation&#x2019; necessitates &#x2018;a more comprehensive understanding&#x2019; to enable &#x2018;the liturgy to reclaim its prophetic voice&#x2019; within cultural contexts (Wepener <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0049">2014</xref>:5).</p>
<p>This integration strategy entails a methodical evaluation of liturgical alterations (Te Velde <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0042">2022</xref>). His paradigm offers objective standards for differentiating cultural components that enhance authentic Reformed worship from those that may undermine doctrinal purity. This paradigm allows African Reformed churches to conduct outdoor garden weddings that embody Reformed theological principles and valid cultural manifestations, while preserving a distinct liturgical emphasis and fostering community involvement (Irwin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0022">2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The integration of White&#x2019;s architectural theology with contemporary African Reformed liturgical studies indicates that garden weddings constitute a valid manifestation of contextual Reformed worship when meticulously planned and theologically substantiated (Baron &#x0026; Let&#x0161;osa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2021</xref>). This methodology respects the Reformed tradition&#x2019;s dedication to genuine worship and the African church&#x2019;s endeavour to maintain indigenous Christian expression with legitimate Reformed theological integrity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20010">
<title>Biblical foundations for worship and covenant-making</title>
<p>Scripture offers substantial precedent for comprehending divine presence and covenant formation beyond architectural limitations. Genesis 2:18&#x2013;25 delineates the archetypal marriage ceremony within a garden context, indicating theological precedence and divine inclination for natural settings in covenantal relationships. The Hebrew language indicates that God deliberately created a garden as the setting for human covenant partnership, with the initial marriage proclamation taking place in this natural environment.</p>
<p>Jesus&#x2019; discourse in John 4:19&#x2013;24 is the most explicit New Testament instruction regarding the connection between the location of worship and genuine spiritual activity. His assertion that worship transpires &#x2018;in spirit and truth&#x2019; rather than at designated sites radically alters the comprehension of sacred space. This instruction pertains directly to marriage rites, signifying that divine blessing and presence are accessible wherever authentic covenant commitment is made before God and community witnesses.</p>
<p>These biblical foundations closely correspond with fundamental Reformed theology ideas. From the Garden of Eden to Jesus&#x2019; teachings on spiritual worship, Scripture continually depicts God&#x2019;s presence as surpassing architectural constraints. This comprehension underpins Calvin&#x2019;s dismissal of spatial holiness while offering scriptural justification for outdoor covenant rituals that prioritise people and commitment above ceremonial contexts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20011">
<title>Contemporary cultural contexts and garden weddings</title>
<p>The occurrence of garden marriages transcends various cultural and demographic borders among Reformed groups. Current trends reveal an increasing preference for outdoor wedding venues among Afrikaans-speaking, English-speaking and African Reformed-speaking churches, indicating broader cultural transformations rather than distinct ethnic inclinations. This cross-cultural phenomenon demonstrates that garden weddings embody modern ideas concerning natural beauty, intimate celebration and personal expression, rather than specific cultural traditions.</p>
<p>Modern African theological reflection offers significant insights for evaluating the proper integration of cultural practices with Christian theological concepts. Oduyoye (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0034">2009</xref>:73) contends that genuine African Christianity requires a deliberate amalgamation of indigenous cultural practices with Christian doctrine rather than mere imitation of Western ecclesiastical frameworks. This principle is widely applicable to all cultural circumstances, pursuing an authentic expression of Reformed religion, rather than being exclusively &#x2018;African&#x2019;.</p>
<p>Mbiti&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0028">2015</xref>:20) notion of &#x2018;true African Christianity&#x2019; advocates for manifestations of Christian religion that are both contextually relevant and distinctly Christian. This framework establishes criteria for assessing liturgical modifications as either authentic cultural expressions that enrich Christian theological comprehension or as superficial adjustments that undermine doctrinal integrity. These ideas are universally applicable to all cultural circumstances, pursuing genuine Reformed expression.</p>
<p>This study employs a literary research methodology grounded in hermeneutical analysis to examine the theological compatibility of garden marriages across Reformed church traditions. The study utilises a comprehensive textual analysis approach that incorporates historical, theological and cultural literary sources to provide an in-depth understanding of the research topic.</p>
<p>The methodology relies on contextual theological hermeneutics, employing Reformed interpretative traditions and integrating diverse cultural perspectives. This approach recognises that Reformed theology has consistently been contextual rather than abstract, requiring careful analysis of the application of theological conceptions within specific cultural and historical settings.</p>
<p>Literature was obtained with the subsequent subject keywords and search terms: Revised liturgy, garden weddings, outdoor worship, African Christianity, liturgical inculturation, contextual theology, covenant theology, sacred space, postcolonial theology and African Reformed churches. The inquiries were conducted in the subsequent academic databases and repositories: (1) Journal Storage (JSTOR), (2) EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier, (3) Google Scholar, (4) American Theological Library Association Serials (ATLAS) and (5) the South African Theological Bibliography (SATB). The periodicals consulted were <italic>In die Skriflig, Hervormde Teologiese Studies (HTS) Theological Studies, The Ecumenical Review, Studia Liturgica</italic> and <italic>Verbum et Ecclesia</italic>, among others. Sources were assessed for inclusion based on a publication period from 2010 to 2025 for journal articles and book chapters. Sources predating 2010 were included exclusively if they were essential, seminal or doctrinal texts for which no adequate contemporary equivalent exists (for example, Calvin&#x2019;s Institutes and the Westminster Confession of Faith). A total of 62 sources were acquired from all databases. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 sources were selected for this investigation. The inclusion criteria specified that sources must be: (1) directly relevant to Reformed liturgy, African theology, contextual worship or sacred space theology; (2) peer-reviewed journal articles, scholarly monographs or recognised theological works; and (3) available in full text. The exclusion criteria eliminated sources that were: (1) not peer-reviewed or without academic accreditation; (2) generated outside the specified time frame without seminal importance; or (3) solely focused on non-Reformed or non-African theological traditions without broader relevance. Both journal articles and book chapters were assessed. Non-peer-reviewed sources were excluded unless they were official confessional or denominational documents of recognised authority.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20012">
<title>Ethical considerations</title>
<p>This article followed all ethical standards for research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0013">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s20014">
<title>Theological analysis of garden weddings</title>
<sec id="s30015">
<title>Liturgical integrity and environmental considerations</title>
<p>The primary theological inquiry regarding garden weddings is whether outdoor settings may maintain the liturgical integrity mandated by Reformed worship theology. Ahn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2022</xref>:28) delineates four essential conditions for integrity: (1) the unequivocal declaration of God&#x2019;s Word, (2) active involvement of the congregation, (3) a reverent environment appropriate to worship and (4) a persistent dedication to covenant fidelity. These requirements are equally applicable across all venues, and outdoor environments must be assessed against them rather than any assumed architectural standard.</p>
<p>Garden weddings can fulfil these criteria when intentional liturgical planning considers the environmental factors intrinsic to outdoor ceremonies. Proper sound amplification ensures the Word is articulated clearly to the gathered community; intentional seating arrangements promote congregational involvement, as essential to Reformed ecclesiology; and meticulous site selection reduces sensory distractions that could undermine reverence. Nixon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0031">2019</xref>:14) accurately notes that the theological issue is not the physical environment itself, but rather whether that environment facilitates or hinders genuine worship. In this context, the outside environment is theologically neutral; the decisive factor is the intentionality behind the pursuit of liturgical objectives within it.</p>
<p>This role aligns with the notion articulated by Hughes Oliphant Old, who asserts that liturgical modifications are theologically justifiable when they enhance rather than undermine the fundamental components of worship. This concept, when applied to garden weddings, asserts that outdoor venues are theologically valid if they actively promote, rather than merely accept, the declaration of God&#x2019;s covenant faithfulness and the communal testimony to the marriage bond. The theological inquiry is not whether a garden can accommodate a Reformed ceremony, but rather if each specific ceremony is conducted with the theological gravity that covenant-making before God necessitates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30016">
<title>Practical challenges and theological implications</title>
<p>Garden weddings pose several practical issues that hold significant theological implications, necessitating thorough ecclesiastical consideration. Unpredictable weather can interrupt liturgical ceremonies, undermining the solemnity essential for covenant-making rituals. Subpar acoustic settings jeopardise the clarity of the proclaimed Word and exchanged vows, so undermining the communal testimony central to Reformed marriage doctrine. Moreover, the economic focus of several garden venues often prioritises aesthetic spectacle over spiritual significance, a concern corroborated by De Lacy and Shackleton&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">2017</xref>) examination of the growing monetisation of hallowed outdoor places.</p>
<p>The logistical challenges are theologically pertinent because they immediately impact the integrity of the marriage vow. Reformed theology asserts that marriage is a sacred bond established before God and observed by the assembled faith community. When venue constraints hinder significant congregational engagement, amplify distractions, or diminish the ceremony to a mere visual spectacle, the theological essence of the event is genuinely jeopardised. The transition from covenant-centred worship to artistically driven spectacle represents not only a practical deficiency, but also a doctrinal one, as it undermines the theological intent of the ceremony.</p>
<p>These issues, however, are not theologically disqualifying. These are contingent challenges that can be significantly mitigated through deliberate, systematic planning. Thorough weather contingency plans, expertly placed audio systems and continuous liturgical supervision prioritising doctrinal goals over aesthetic choices can maintain the theological integrity of an outdoor service. The critical factor is not the existence of practical challenges, such as those that accompany any act of worship, but rather whether those overseeing the ceremony exhibit the theological gravity necessary to prioritise all practical arrangements in accordance with the fundamental objectives of covenant worship.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s30017">
<title>Integration of cultural elements</title>
<p>The integration of cultural practices into garden wedding ceremonies necessitates meticulous and ongoing theological discernment, especially within the African Reformed context, where issues of liturgical inculturation converge with the remnants of colonial oppression and the demands of postcolonial restoration. The primary objective is to differentiate between cultural expressions that genuinely enhance the theological essence of the marriage bond and those that may undermine or dilute its doctrinal foundation. Utilising Oduyoye&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0033">1995</xref>) framework, components that bolster communal covenant-witness, such as ancestral blessing prayers reinterpreted through a Trinitarian lens, music that culturally articulates the sovereignty of God and the deliberate inclusion of extended family participation as a manifestation of the covenantal community can serve as authentic enhancements to Reformed liturgical practice rather than deviations from it.</p>
<p>Cultural integration necessitates theological discernment rather than unexamined acceptance. Cultural elements that undermine the exclusivity of monotheistic worship, incorporate practices of ancestor veneration or supplant the christological focus of the marriage covenant with communal or ethnic allegiances cannot be integrated into a confessionally Reformed framework, regardless of their cultural importance. According to Anderson (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2016</xref>:38), the aim is not to accommodate culture as an end in itself, but to contextually articulate Reformed theological convictions in ways that are authentically comprehensible and expressively authentic within a specific community. Culture functions as a conduit for religious discourse; it does not establish a theological standard.</p>
<p>This principle is applicable to all cultural groups within the Reformed tradition. Afrikaans-speaking, English-speaking and other Reformed groups each grapple with the inherent contradiction between genuine contextual expression and adherence to confessional principles. The theological framework is coherent: Cultural aspects are theologically valid if they support, rather than undermine, the covenantal and doxological objectives of the marriage ritual. Preserving this uniformity protects against the cultural imperialism of enforcing a uniform liturgical aesthetic and the doctrinal leniency of uncritically embracing all cultural expressions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0018">
<title>Validity</title>
<p>The study&#x2019;s validity was guaranteed by implementing clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, conducting triangulated searches across five academic databases, prioritising peer-reviewed and recognised sources, and maintaining transparency about the contextual hermeneutical framework utilised.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0019">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s20020">
<title>Practical guidelines for theological integrity</title>
<sec id="s30021">
<title>Pre-ceremony planning</title>
<p>Ensuring theological integrity in garden weddings necessitates thorough pre-planning that addresses both liturgical considerations and practical arrangements (Moll <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0029">2025</xref>:14). Couples and church leaders must formulate comprehensive contingency plans for weather-related disruptions, implement suitable sound systems for clear communication and organise seating to promote congregational engagement rather than solely for aesthetic purposes.</p>
<p>Garden locations ought to be assessed based on their ability to facilitate worship rather than their aesthetic qualities (Aderonmu &#x0026; Gbotosho <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2020</xref>:2). Venue selection must account for accessibility for elderly or disabled individuals, mitigation of environmental distractions and spatial configurations that visually highlight the covenant ceremony. These pragmatic factors embody profound religious commitments to inclusive community engagement and a reverent emphasis on worship.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s20022">
<title>Liturgical adaptations</title>
<p>A garden wedding liturgy may require modifications while maintaining fundamental Reformed components. The traditional Reformed wedding liturgy, typically extensive and tailored for church acoustics, may require adaptation for outdoor environments without sacrificing doctrinal integrity (White <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0050">2003</xref>). The essential liturgical components, scriptural readings, congregational singing, pastoral address, exchange of vows and benediction, must be preserved while modifying their presentation for outdoor settings.</p>
<p>The selection of music is especially significant in garden environments. Musical selections ought to enhance the event&#x2019;s theological emphasis rather than serve solely as cultural or aesthetic embellishments. The use of culturally appropriate musical elements should augment, not supplant, congregational singing, so as to reinforce the liturgical objective of fostering genuine worship expression in the outdoor setting.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20023">
<title>Community participation</title>
<p>Reformed theology underscores the communal aspect of the marriage bond, requiring active participation by the community rather than mere observation. Garden wedding preparations ought to foster significant community involvement via responsive liturgical components, congregational singing and spatial configurations that incorporate rather than exclude the bridal party from the wider community (Leene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0025">2017</xref>:266).</p>
<p>Preserving community emphasis in aesthetically orientated environments necessitates meticulous liturgical guidance that continually highlights the theological importance of the covenant being observed. This focus on community involvement illustrates Reformed theological principles on the priesthood of all Christians and the collective essence of covenant testimony.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0024">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Garden marriages in Reformed churches can be theologically valid when undertaken with rigorous theological contemplation and deliberate liturgical design. The outdoor setting presents no intrinsic theological issues for genuine Reformed worship, provided practical arrangements facilitate rather than obstruct the fundamental liturgical components. The fundamental theological concept is that places of worship must be assessed according to their ability to facilitate the faithful preaching of God&#x2019;s Word, foster meaningful community engagement and ensure reverent focus on the holy covenant being established.</p>
<p>Garden venues that meet these liturgical criteria while genuinely integrating appropriate cultural elements might serve as effective venues for Reformed marriage ceremonies. Garden weddings should be selected not based on aesthetic tastes or economic influences, but through theological contemplation regarding how venue selections might most effectively fulfil the sacred goal of covenant-making before God and the faith community.</p>
<p>This theological framework holds that Reformed churches may accept garden weddings as valid expressions of Christian marriage, while upholding Reformed liturgical standards and doctrinal integrity. When executed correctly, the outdoor setting can significantly augment specific facets of communal celebration while maintaining fundamental principles of Reformed covenant theology.</p>
<p>The discourse around garden wedding customs prompts significant inquiries over genuine Christian expression, transcending mere venue choice to encompass essential matters of cultural identity and theological integrity within modern Reformed Christianity. This tendency compels all Reformed communities, irrespective of cultural background, to critically address issues of liturgical adaptation, cultural authenticity and doctrinal fidelity in swiftly evolving social situations.</p>
<p>Future research ought to investigate case studies of effective garden wedding liturgies, formulate comprehensive practical guidelines for multiple cultural situations and analyse overarching issues of liturgical inculturation within modern Reformed churches across varied cultural environments. The objective remains unchanged: a genuine articulation of Reformed theological principles through liturgical practices that respect both confessional integrity and authentic cultural diversity.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<sec id="s20025" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The author, Ndidzulafhi Mudau, declares that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20026">
<title>CRediT authorship contribution</title>
<p>Ndidzulafhi Mudau: Conceptualisation, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. The author confirms that this work is entirely their own, has reviewed the article, approved the final version for submission and publication and takes full responsibility for the integrity of its findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20027" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability</title>
<p>Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20028">
<title>Disclaimer</title>
<p>The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The author is responsible for this article&#x2019;s results, findings and content.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<ref-list id="references">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="CIT0001"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Adashinskaya</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Renaissances in Byzantium and Byzantium in the renaissance: The international development of ideas and terminology in late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Europe</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>S.</given-names> <surname>Kallestrup</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.</given-names> <surname>Kuni&#x0144;ska</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>M.A.</given-names> <surname>Mihail</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>Adashinskaya</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>C.</given-names> <surname>Minea</surname></string-name></person-group> (eds.), <source><italic>Periodization in the art historiographies of Central and Eastern Europe</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>, <publisher-name>Routledge</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Abingdon</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0002"><mixed-citation publication-type="conf-proc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Aderonmu</surname>, <given-names>P.A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Gbotosho</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Assessment of landscape impact on worship: A focus on worshippers&#x2019; perception</article-title>&#x2019;, in <conf-name>IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering, 1107: 4th International Conference on Engineering for a Sustainable World (ICESW 2020), Covenant University</conf-name>, <conf-date>10&#x2013;14 August 2020</conf-date>, <conf-loc>Ota, Nigeria</conf-loc>, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0003"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Ahn</surname>, <given-names>E.H</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The criteria of liturgical worship and analysis of Wesley&#x2019;s theology and how his approach challenges contemporary Christians, especially in terms of worship</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Master&#x2019;s thesis</comment>, <publisher-name>Liberty University</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0004"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Anderson</surname>, <given-names>V</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2016</year>, <source><italic>Beyond ontological blackness: An essay on African American religious and cultural criticism</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Bloomsbury Publishing</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0005"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bainbridge</surname>, <given-names>A.H</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2015</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Birth, death, and marriage in the garden: Canterbury colonial women gardeners, 1850&#x2013;1914</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>University of Waikato</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0006"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Bains</surname>, <given-names>D.R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Protestant spaces in North America</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>J.H.</given-names> <surname>Kilde</surname></string-name></person-group> (ed.), <source><italic>The Oxford handbook of religious space</italic></source>, p. <fpage>442</fpage>, <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0007"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Baldovin</surname>, <given-names>J.F</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>A liturgical reform in peril? <italic>Sacrosanctum concilium</italic> sixty years on</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>C.V.</given-names> <surname>Johnson</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G.</given-names> <surname>Moore</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>P.G.</given-names> <surname>Williams</surname></string-name></person-group> (eds.), <source><italic>Sacrosanctum Concilium: Exploring liturgical futures</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>, <publisher-name>Springer Nature Switzerland</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0008"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Baron</surname>, <given-names>E</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Let&#x0161;osa</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Liturgy as an anti-racist praxis for reformed churches in South Africa</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>In die Skriflig</italic></source> <volume>55</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>a2709</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v55i2.2709">https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v55i2.2709</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0009"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Breytenbach</surname>, <given-names>W.M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Transforming ecclesiological imagination on liturgy: Reimagining a Dutch reformed church in Durbanville</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>Stellenbosch University</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0010"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Burnett-Cole</surname>, <given-names>T.A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Towards a decolonial liturgical inculturation: An indigenous contribution to intercultural worship in the united church of Canada</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>Emmanuel College and the University of Toronto</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0011"><mixed-citation publication-type="conf-proc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Crawford</surname>, <given-names>G.A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Where has sacred space gone? Exploring the temple-presence of god in the church assembly</article-title>&#x2019;, <conf-name>Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Kansas City, MO</conf-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0012"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>De Lacy</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Shackleton</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2017</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Aesthetic and spiritual ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Sustainability</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1628</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091628">https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091628</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0013"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Dowson</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>An exploration of the theological tensions in the use of churches for events</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>(<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21427/WSBG-JX77">https://doi.org/10.21427/WSBG-JX77</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0014"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Farmer</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Sacrosanct or sacred: Creating a theological framework to undergird church design</chapter-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctor of Ministry Projects and Theses. 51</comment>, <publisher-name>Southern Methodist University</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0015"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Galbreath</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2019</year>, <source><italic>Re-forming the liturgy: Past, present, and future</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Wipf and Stock Publishers, Wipf and Stock</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Eugene, OR</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0016"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><surname>German</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Barton</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Macinnes</surname>, <given-names>A.I</given-names></string-name></person-group>. (eds.), <year>2021</year>, <source><italic>Scottish liturgical traditions and religious politics: From reformers to Jacobites, 1560&#x2013;1764</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Edinburgh University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Edinburgh</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0017"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Gibson</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Earngey</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2018</year>, <source><italic>Reformation worship: Liturgies from the past for the present</italic></source>, <publisher-name>New Growth Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Greensboro, NC</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0018"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Hackett</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>And the future of liturgical architecture</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>C.V.</given-names> <surname>Johnson</surname></string-name>, <string-name><given-names>G.</given-names> <surname>Moore</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>P.G.</given-names> <surname>Williams</surname></string-name></person-group> (eds.), <source><italic>Sacrosanctum Concilium: Exploring liturgical futures</italic></source>, p. <fpage>165</fpage>, <publisher-name>Palgrave Macmillan</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0019"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Harries</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2018</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Christian marriage in African society</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>A.</given-names> <surname>Phillips</surname></string-name></person-group> (ed.), <source><italic>Survey of African marriage and family life</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>448</lpage>, <publisher-name>Routledge</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0020"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Holder</surname>, <given-names>R.W</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, <source><italic>Calvin and the Christian tradition</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0021"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Iheanacho</surname>, <given-names>V.U</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The significance of African oral tradition in the making of African Christianity</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies</italic></source> <volume>77</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>a6819</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.6819">https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i2.6819</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0022"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Irwin</surname>, <given-names>K.W</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2018</year>, <source><italic>Context and text: A method for liturgical theology</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Liturgical Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Collegeville, MN</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0023"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Jones</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Worship styles in the Christian church</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>G.</given-names> <surname>Ballou</surname></string-name> &#x0026; <string-name><given-names>D.</given-names> <surname>Jones</surname></string-name></person-group> (Eds.), <source><italic>Handbook for sound engineers</italic></source>, <edition>6th edn.</edition>, pp. <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>197</lpage>, <publisher-name>Focal Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0024"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kaemingk</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Willson</surname>, <given-names>C.B</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, <source><italic>Work and worship: Reconnecting our labor and liturgy</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Baker Academic</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Grand Rapids, MI</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0025"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Leene</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2017</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>A day to remember: A community-based understanding of the wedding liturgy</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Vos</surname></string-name></person-group> (Ed.), <source><italic>Liturgy and ethics: New contributions from Reformed perspectives</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>266</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>284</lpage>, <publisher-name>Brill</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Leiden</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0026"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Maluleke</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Black and African theologies in search of comprehensive environmental justice</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Theology for Southern Africa</italic></source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0027"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mayhew-Smith</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, <source><italic>Landscape liturgies: Outdoor worship resources from the Christian tradition</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Canterbury Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Norwich</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0028"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mbiti</surname>, <given-names>J.S</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2015</year>, <source><italic>Introduction to African religion</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Waveland Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Long Grove, IL</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0029"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Moll</surname>, <given-names>M.J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2025</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Towards an integration between pre-marital counselling and marriage liturgies in the Dutch reformed church: A practical theological exploration</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>Stellenbosch University</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0030"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nguyen</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The altar in the liturgy and liturgical space: Making place and movements</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral dissertation, Thesis</comment>, <publisher-name>Boston College University Libraries</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0031"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nixon</surname>, <given-names>B.I</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2019</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Engaging sacred space and experiencing God in the mountains: A study of the non-traditional worship environment of mountain cathedrals, an ecumenical meetup group based in Albuquerque</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Master&#x2019;s thesis</comment>, <publisher-name>The University of New Mexico</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0032"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Nyawuza</surname>, <given-names>M.P</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2019</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The sacramental ministry in African presbyterian congregations in Pretoria: A liturgical-theological critique</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>University of Pretoria</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0033"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Oduyoye</surname>, <given-names>M.A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>1995</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Calling the church to account: African women and liberation</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>The Ecumenical Review</italic></source> <volume>47</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>479</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>489</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0034"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Oduyoye</surname>, <given-names>M.A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2009</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Hearing and knowing: Theological reflections on Christianity in Africa</chapter-title>&#x2019;, <publisher-name>Wipf and Stock Publishers</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0035"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Old</surname>, <given-names>H.O</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, <source><italic>The Patristic Roots of Reformed Worship</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Wipf and Stock Publishers</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Eugene</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0036"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Packiam</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, <source><italic>The resilient pastor: Leading your church in a rapidly changing world</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Baker Books</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Grand Rapids, MI</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0037"><mixed-citation publication-type="conf-proc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Peil</surname>, <given-names>T.R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Worship developments after the Reformation that call for careful appraisal</article-title>&#x2019;, <conf-name>paper presented at the Wisconsin Lutheran Seminary Symposium</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Mequon, WI</conf-loc>, <comment>viewed n.d., from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://essays.wisluthsem.org:8080/handle/123456789/7530">http://essays.wisluthsem.org:8080/handle/123456789/7530</ext-link>.</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0038"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Rempel</surname>, <given-names>J.D</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, <source><italic>Recapturing an enchanted world: Ritual and sacrament in the free church tradition</italic></source>, <publisher-name>InterVarsity Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Downers Grove, IL</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0039"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sarkodie</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Breaking up the body of Christ: A practical theological appraisal of the exclusion from holy communion experienced by Catholics married according to Asante traditional custom without the celebration of an ecclesiastically recognised wedding</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>Palm Beach Atlantic University</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0040"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Sikorska</surname>, <given-names>L</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, <source><italic>Nineteenth-and twentieth-century readings of the medieval orient: Other encounters</italic></source>, vol. <volume>32</volume>, <publisher-name>Walter de Gruyter GmbH &#x0026; Co KG</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0041"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Smit</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2017</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>What makes worship good?</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>P.</given-names> <surname>Vos</surname></string-name></person-group> (ed.), <source><italic>Liturgy and ethics: New contributions from Reformed perspectives</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>, <publisher-name>Brill</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Leiden</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0042"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Te Velde</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, <source><italic>Evaluating liturgical reform: Four criteria derived from a theological concept of tradiction</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Peeters</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Leuven</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0043"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Toliver</surname>, <given-names>L.M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Multigenerational worship: Liturgical dance and mime within the African American Baptist Church</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Doctoral thesis</comment>, <publisher-name>Andrews University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Berrien Springs, MI</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0044"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Tsatalbasidis</surname>, <given-names>K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2019</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Toward a biblical theology of God&#x2019;s presence in Christian theology: A study of how difference interpretations of the divine presence affect liturgy</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>PhD dissertation</comment>, <publisher-name>Andrews University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Berrien Springs, MI</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0045"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Van Eeden</surname>, <given-names>F.C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2018</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The development of an icon for a Reformed liturgy in a South African context</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>Master&#x2019;s thesis, MTh, Practical Theology</comment>, <publisher-name>University of Pretoria</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Pretoria</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0046"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Von Allmen</surname>, <given-names>J.-J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, <source><italic>Worship, its theology and practice</italic></source>, <publisher-name>ISD, Bristol</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0047"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Warfield</surname>, <given-names>B.B</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2020</year>, <source><italic>On the revision of the confession of faith: Enriched edition. Preserving tradition and faith: A deep dive into theological integrity</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Good Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Glasgow</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0048"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Weaver</surname>, <given-names>L.M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Witvliet</surname>, <given-names>J.D</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, <source><italic>Worship and power: Liturgical authority in free Church traditions</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Wipf and Stock Publishers</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Eugene, OR</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0049"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Wepener</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Liturgical inculturation or liberation? A qualitative exploration of major themes in liturgical reform in South Africa</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>HTS Theological Studies</italic></source> <volume>70</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>a2644</fpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0050"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>White</surname>, <given-names>J.F</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2003</year>, <source><italic>Protestant worship and church architecture: Theological and historical considerations</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Wipf &#x0026; Stock</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Eugene, OR</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0051"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Yirenkyi</surname>, <given-names>S.M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2019</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Ritual performative ceremonies and values in the African context</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of African and Asian Studies</italic></source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7176/jaas/57-04">https://doi.org/10.7176/jaas/57-04</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn><p><bold>How to cite this article:</bold> Mudau, N., 2026, &#x2018;A theological reflection on garden weddings: Interrogating the Reformed liturgy within the African context&#x2019;, <italic>Inkanyiso</italic> 18(1), a341. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/ink.v18i1.341">https://doi.org/10.4102/ink.v18i1.341</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>