Opinion Paper

Izinseka: African somatic epistemology and the neuroscience of bodily knowing

Thabani Khumalo
Inkanyiso | Vol 18, No 1 | a377 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ink.v18i1.377 | © 2026 Thabani Khumalo | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 11 March 2026 | Published: 16 September 2026

About the author(s)

Thabani Khumalo, Discipline of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa

Abstract

African thought has long held the body as a primary site of knowing. In Nguni-Zulu epistemology, izinseka names a class of somatic knowing spanning pre-cognitive reflexive response to another’s distress, cultivated empathic sensitivity of caregivers, and refined diagnostic insight of isangoma. Western psychology has typically approached such knowing through a pathology frame, reading somatic presentations as failures of an assumed mind–body hierarchy. This article argues that izinseka is neither mystical nor merely phenomenological but epistemologically sovereign and physiologically grounded, and proposes it as a foundational concept for African psychology. The argument proceeds in four movements: (1) formalising izinseka as an epistemological category, (2) tracing how the same phenomena were pathologised within Western clinical psychology, (3) presenting convergent neuroscientific evidence, including polyvagal theory and interoceptive processing, as corroboration rather than validation, and (4) examining the isangoma as a case study of a trained somatic knower, towards a decolonial reframing of somatic symptom diagnosis. Clinicians and scholars are called to recognise somatic experience not as pathological conversion of psychological content into physical form, but as the body performing its oldest cognitive function with fidelity.
Contribution: African psychology has affirmed somatic knowing philosophically, while its physiological grounding has remained unarticulated. Drawing on Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis, Porges’ polyvagal theory, enteric nervous system research, mirror neuron studies, and predictive processing, the article shows that izinseka has clear physiological substrates: the gut–brain axis, insular interoceptive processing, and the autonomic social engagement system, whose architecture was identified by African thought before neuroscience formally described it. Ukuthwasa is reframed as neurophysiological training.


 


Keywords

izinseka (izinseke); somatic knowing; Ubuntu; interoception; polyvagal theory; enteric nervous system; decolonial psychology; isangoma

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 367
Total article views: 284


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.